Are "incident-to" wRVU's generated by a non-physician provider included in the MGMA data reported for physician wRVU's?
This was a key question in a recent healthcare compensation study we performed.
It turns out that they are included in the physician data. The "TC/NPP Excluded" that appears in many of the tables in MGMA's Physician and Production Compensation Survey is not intended to include the incident-to wRVU's generated by non-physician providers.
Here is what I am referring to:
The NPP Excluded from the chart above indicates that independently performed non-physician provider services are not included. Those services relate to non-physician provider work billed directly under the non-physician provider's provider number (typically at a discount from physician rates).
Therefore, the inclusion of non-physician provider wRVU's may or may not be appropriate to include in a healthcare compensation study, depending on the facts and circumstances. The key, as always, is to make sure the underlying data is appropriately matched.
Friday, March 12, 2010 by





Comments for MGMA Benchmarking - Physician Extender wRVU's